The Eulmi Incident and the Assassination of Empress Myeongseong: Japan's Brutal Crime in Korea
The Eulmi Incident and the Assassination of Empress Myeongseong: Japan's Brutal Crime in Korea
Explore the shocking 1895 assassination of Korean Empress Myeongseong by Japanese agents in Gyeongbokgung Palace, a brutal crime that intensified Korean resistance and exposed Japan's imperial aggression during the colonial era.
Table of Contents
1. The Empress Who Challenged Japanese Ambitions
Empress Myeongseong (1851-1895), posthumously known as Empress Myeongseong and during her lifetime as Queen Min, stands as one of the most remarkable and tragic figures in Korean history. Rising from relative obscurity to become the most powerful woman in late Joseon Dynasty, she wielded enormous political influence during Korea's most turbulent period. Her fierce resistance to Japanese imperial ambitions made her a target, ultimately leading to her brutal assassination in one of the most shocking crimes in Asian diplomatic history—the Eulmi Incident of October 8, 1895.
The empress's political career began in 1866 when she married King Gojong at age fifteen, initially appearing as just another royal consort. However, she possessed extraordinary intelligence, political acumen, and determination that would transform her into Korea's de facto ruler alongside her husband. After helping orchestrate the removal of Heungseon Daewongun from power in 1873, Queen Min built a powerful political faction that dominated Korean governance for over two decades.
Her relationship with Japan evolved from cautious cooperation to bitter antagonism as she recognized Japanese ambitions threatened Korean sovereignty. While initially viewing Japan as a potential counterbalance to Chinese influence, she increasingly saw Japanese "modernization" assistance as a cover for colonial domination. By the 1890s, Queen Min had become Japan's most formidable obstacle in Korea, actively seeking alliances with Russia and other powers to check Japanese expansion—a strategy that would ultimately cost her life.
What do you think drives individuals to resist overwhelming power even when facing mortal danger?
1.1 Queen Min's Political Power and Foreign Policy Maneuvering
Queen Min's political genius lay in her ability to navigate the treacherous landscape of late 19th century international relations. Korea found itself caught between competing imperial powers—China claiming traditional suzerainty, Japan pursuing aggressive modernization and expansion, Russia seeking warm-water ports and influence, and Western nations probing for commercial and diplomatic advantages. In this environment, Queen Min developed a sophisticated strategy of playing powers against each other to preserve Korean independence.
Her initial post-opening policy favored limited cooperation with Japan, viewing Japanese modernization as a model Korea might selectively adopt while using Japanese support to reduce Chinese interference. However, the Imo Incident of 1882 and subsequent Chinese military intervention demonstrated that both China and Japan sought to control rather than assist Korea. Queen Min began shifting toward a more balanced approach, sometimes favoring Chinese connections, other times Japanese, while increasingly exploring Russian options as a counterweight to both.
The First Sino-Japanese War (1894-1895) proved decisive in reshaping Queen Min's calculations. Japan's stunning military victory over China fundamentally altered East Asian power dynamics, eliminating Chinese influence in Korea and leaving Japan as the dominant external force. Recognizing that Japanese victory meant increased pressure for Korean subordination, Queen Min desperately sought Russian support as the only remaining power capable of checking Japanese ambitions. This pivot to Russia directly threatened Japanese plans and marked her for elimination.
Key aspects of Queen Min's political strategy:
- Factional politics mastery building powerful support networks within Korean government
- Playing great powers against each other to preserve Korean maneuvering room
- Promotion of modernization reforms while resisting foreign control
- Strategic marriages and appointments placing allies in key positions
- Increasingly pro-Russian stance after recognizing Japanese imperial intentions
1.2 The Reformist Challenge and Japanese Interference
Queen Min's power faced domestic challenges from reform-minded officials who criticized her conservative tendencies and family-based patronage networks. The Enlightenment Party (Gaehwadang), led by figures like Kim Ok-gyun, advocated radical modernization along Japanese lines and viewed Queen Min's faction as obstacles to necessary reforms. Their attempted coup during the Gapsin Coup of 1884 failed due to Chinese military intervention, but highlighted growing domestic opposition to the Min family's dominance.
Japanese involvement in Korean politics intensified after the Treaty of Shimonoseki (1895) ending the Sino-Japanese War confirmed Japanese dominance. Japanese officials, particularly Minister Miura Goro, increasingly viewed Queen Min as the primary obstacle to Japanese control. They observed that King Gojong, while theoretically ruling, usually deferred to his wife's judgment on major policy decisions. Therefore, Japanese strategists concluded that eliminating the empress might be necessary to establish a compliant Korean government.
The Japanese-backed Gabo Reforms of 1894-1895 attempted to modernize Korean institutions while increasing Japanese influence. Queen Min initially cooperated with some reforms but increasingly resisted changes that would undermine royal authority or increase Japanese control. Her opposition to Japanese demands regarding military restructuring, financial administration, and political appointments convinced Japanese officials that diplomatic pressure alone couldn't overcome her resistance. More drastic measures would be necessary.
Have you experienced situations where external powers interfere in internal political conflicts?
2. The Conspiracy and Brutal Assassination
2.1 Japanese Planning and the Role of Miura Goro
Miura Goro, appointed Japanese Minister to Korea in September 1895, arrived with clear instructions to neutralize Queen Min's influence by any means necessary. A former general and hardline militarist, Miura possessed neither diplomatic subtlety nor moral constraints about using violence to achieve policy goals. Within weeks of arrival, he began coordinating with Japanese residents in Korea, disaffected Korean officials, and Japanese military advisors to plan the queen's removal.
The conspiracy involved multiple Japanese groups: official legation staff, military officers serving as "advisors" to Korean forces, soshi (Japanese political thugs and right-wing activists), and Korean collaborators including officers in the new Japanese-trained Korean military units. This combination of official and unofficial actors provided Japanese government plausible deniability while ensuring sufficient military force to overcome palace guards. The planning demonstrated sophisticated coordination and ruthless determination.
Japanese plotters exploited Korean political divisions, recruiting disaffected officials and military officers who opposed Queen Min's dominance or sought Japanese favor. Key Korean collaborators included Yi Ju-hoe, commander of Korean military units, and Yi Beom-rae, who provided inside information about palace layout and security. These collaborators' involvement gave the operation some appearance of Korean initiative rather than purely foreign aggression, though Japanese direction remained unmistakable.
2.2 The Predawn Attack on Gyeongbokgung Palace
In the early morning hours of October 8, 1895, the conspiracy exploded into brutal violence. Japanese and Korean forces, numbering several hundred armed men, stormed into Gyeongbokgung Palace overcoming the guard detachment. The attackers, led by Japanese military officers and soshi, burst through palace gates around 5:00 AM when most residents still slept. Their objective was clear: locate and kill Queen Min before loyalist forces could organize effective defense.
The assault demonstrated shocking brutality and disregard for diplomatic norms. Armed men ransacked the palace, terrorizing court ladies and officials while searching for the queen. Accounts describe Japanese officers demanding that Koreans identify the queen, threatening and attacking anyone who refused to cooperate. The violation of the royal palace—Korea's most sacred space—by foreign military forces represented an unprecedented insult to Korean sovereignty and dignity.
Queen Min attempted to hide among her ladies-in-waiting, hoping the attackers wouldn't distinguish her from other court women. However, collaborators eventually identified her location. What followed remains disputed in precise details but undeniably horrific: Queen Min was dragged from her chambers, attacked by multiple assailants with swords, and killed in a courtyard of her own palace. Her body was then soaked in kerosene and burned in a nearby grove to destroy evidence—a final degradation of the Korean empress.
Which aspects of national sovereignty violations do you think are most serious?
2.3 The Immediate Aftermath and Cover-up Attempts
The assassins' departure from the palace left behind a scene of devastation and terror. King Gojong, who had been forcibly detained during the attack, was released to discover his wife murdered and the palace violated. Court officials faced an impossible situation: the queen was dead, Japanese forces controlled the palace area, and speaking truthfully about what happened could mean death. The official announcement initially claimed Queen Min had "fallen ill," avoiding mention of assassination.
Japanese authorities immediately began orchestrating a cover-up. Minister Miura claimed the incident was an internal Korean political conflict in which Japan played no role. Japanese participants were quietly evacuated from Korea to prevent their testimony. Korean collaborators received protection and rewards for their silence. The burned remains in the palace grove were hastily buried without proper royal funeral rites, eliminating forensic evidence of the crime's brutality.
However, the truth couldn't be suppressed. Foreign diplomats in Seoul, particularly American and Russian representatives, quickly learned the real story from Korean informants. Their reports to home governments described Japanese government complicity in the assassination. International newspapers published shocking accounts of the crime, generating worldwide condemnation. The cover-up's collapse created enormous diplomatic problems for Japan and fueled Korean hatred of Japanese imperialism.
Has this been helpful so far in understanding the conspiracy's scope and brutality?
3. International Reaction and Japanese Diplomatic Crisis
3.1 Global Condemnation and Diplomatic Fallout
News of Empress Myeongseong's assassination generated unprecedented international outrage. Western newspapers described it as "barbaric," "medieval," and "unworthy of civilized nations"—harsh criticism for an era when European powers themselves practiced brutal imperialism. The violation of diplomatic norms by a minister organizing the murder of a foreign head of state shocked international opinion. Japan's carefully cultivated image as a "civilized" modern nation suffered severe damage.
Russia particularly exploited the incident for diplomatic advantage. Russian diplomats portrayed the assassination as proof of Japanese barbarism and untrustworthiness, arguing that Korea needed Russian protection against Japanese aggression. This narrative found receptive audiences in Western capitals where commercial competition with Japan made negative stories about Japanese behavior politically useful. The diplomatic crisis threatened Japan's international standing at a crucial moment in its emergence as a great power.
The Japanese government faced an impossible choice: admit official involvement and face international consequences, or maintain the cover-up despite overwhelming evidence. They chose a middle path—acknowledging some Japanese participation while claiming it was unauthorized action by rogue elements. Minister Miura and other conspirators were recalled to Japan and subjected to show trials that resulted in acquittals despite clear evidence, satisfying neither international critics nor the need for genuine accountability.
3.2 Korean Public Response and Growing Resistance
Within Korea, the assassination galvanized anti-Japanese sentiment to unprecedented levels. Queen Min, while controversial during her lifetime due to factional politics and family favoritism, became a martyr symbol of Korean resistance to Japanese aggression. The brutality of her murder and the violation of Gyeongbokgung Palace outraged Koreans across social classes, transforming widespread resentment into active hatred of Japanese imperial ambitions.
The righteous army movement (Uibyeong), which had existed in nascent form, exploded into sustained guerrilla resistance after the Eulmi Incident. Former soldiers, yangban aristocrats, peasants, and Confucian scholars took up arms against Japanese forces and Korean collaborators. These irregular forces conducted guerrilla warfare throughout Korea, attacking Japanese installations, assassinating Korean officials viewed as traitors, and creating security problems that persisted for years. The assassination thus backfired strategically, generating resistance that undermined Japanese control.
King Gojong's relationship with Japan was irreparably damaged. Though forced to maintain official diplomatic relations, he deeply distrusted Japanese intentions and sought opportunities for revenge. His eventual flight to the Russian legation in 1896—just months after the assassination—demonstrated complete breakdown of trust. From Russian protection, he repudiated previous pro-Japanese policies and actively sought international support to limit Japanese influence, significantly complicating Japanese colonial ambitions.
Please share your thoughts in the comments about how political assassinations impact national resistance movements!
4. Long-term Consequences and Historical Memory
4.1 Impact on Korean-Japanese Relations
The Eulmi Incident fundamentally poisoned Korean-Japanese relations in ways that persist into the present. The assassination demonstrated that Japan viewed Korea not as a potential partner in modernization but as a territory to be controlled through violence if necessary. This revelation destroyed any remaining illusions among Korean elites about mutually beneficial cooperation and confirmed that Japanese "assistance" meant subordination and eventual annexation.
The crime's brutality particularly resonated in Korean historical memory. The degradation of murdering an empress in her own palace, then burning her body to destroy evidence, violated every norm of Confucian propriety and diplomatic conduct. For Koreans, this represented Japanese civilization's true face—not the modernization and development rhetoric, but brutal violence serving imperial ambitions. This interpretation shaped Korean nationalist ideology throughout the colonial period and beyond.
Japanese handling of the aftermath—the transparent cover-up, show trials producing convenient acquittals, and rewards for Korean collaborators—demonstrated that Japanese justice system served imperial interests rather than genuine accountability. This pattern would repeat throughout the colonial period (1910-1945), with Japanese authorities consistently refusing responsibility for crimes against Koreans while demanding Korean acceptance of Japanese rule. The Eulmi Incident established templates for Japanese colonial violence and denial that profoundly shaped the colonial experience.
4.2 The Empress in Korean Historical Memory
Empress Myeongseong's historical reputation has evolved significantly over time. During the colonial period (1910-1945), Japanese authorities suppressed her memory, portraying her as an obstacle to modernization who justly faced consequences. Korean nationalists, by contrast, elevated her as a martyred patriot who died resisting foreign aggression. These competing narratives made the empress a contested symbol in Korean-Japanese historical disputes.
Post-liberation Korean historiography initially continued the nationalist martyrdom narrative, portraying Empress Myeongseong as an unambiguous heroine of anti-Japanese resistance. More recent scholarship has produced more nuanced assessments, acknowledging her genuine resistance to Japanese imperialism while also examining her factional politics, conservative tendencies, and family-based patronage networks that hindered reform. This balanced approach recognizes both her patriotic resistance and the complexities of her political career.
Contemporary Korean culture has enthusiastically embraced Empress Myeongseong's story through numerous historical dramas, films, novels, and theatrical productions. The 1995 centennial of the assassination generated renewed public interest, with major commemorative events and scholarly conferences. Her story resonates with contemporary Korean audiences as a symbol of resistance to aggression, the importance of national sovereignty, and the personal costs of fighting for independence against overwhelming power.
4.3 Unresolved Historical Issues and Ongoing Disputes
The Eulmi Incident remains contentious in Korean-Japanese relations today. Korean governments have repeatedly demanded official Japanese apologies and full disclosure of documents related to the conspiracy. Japanese responses have ranged from vague expressions of regret to outright denials of official responsibility, claiming the assassination was unauthorized action by individuals rather than government policy—a position Korean historians reject as historically false.
The lack of genuine accountability for the crime feeds broader Korean grievances about Japanese treatment of colonial-era history. Koreans point to the Eulmi Incident as exemplifying a pattern: Japanese imperial aggression, war crimes and atrocities, followed by denial, minimization, or justification rather than honest acknowledgment and apology. This pattern, repeated regarding comfort women, forced labor, and other colonial abuses, creates ongoing diplomatic tensions that prevent full reconciliation between the two nations.
Contemporary relevance of the Eulmi Incident:
- Importance of historical accountability for building trust between nations
- Political assassination impacts on national consciousness and resistance movements
- Gender dimensions of violence against women leaders in political conflicts
- Colonial violence legacies shaping post-colonial international relations
- Contested historical narratives as obstacles to reconciliation
If this article was helpful, please share it with others interested in Korean history and international relations!
In conclusion, the Eulmi Incident and assassination of Empress Myeongseong represents one of the most shocking crimes in modern Asian history and a defining moment in Korean-Japanese relations. The brutal murder of Korea's empress by Japanese agents in 1895 demonstrated the violence underlying Japanese imperial ambitions and destroyed any possibility of genuine Korean-Japanese partnership. Empress Myeongseong's resistance to Japanese domination made her a target, but her assassination backfired strategically by galvanizing Korean nationalism and anti-Japanese resistance that would persist throughout the colonial period. The crime's brutality—violating the royal palace, murdering the empress, burning her body—shocked international opinion and damaged Japan's reputation as a civilized modern nation. The inadequate accountability, with show trials producing convenient acquittals and rewards for collaborators, established patterns of Japanese denial regarding colonial-era crimes that continue poisoning relations today. For Koreans, the Eulmi Incident symbolizes both the brutality of foreign imperial aggression and the importance of resistance, transforming Empress Myeongseong into a martyred symbol of national sovereignty whose memory continues inspiring discussions about independence, justice, and historical accountability more than a century after her death.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q1. Who was Empress Myeongseong and why was she important in Korean history?
Empress Myeongseong (1851-1895), known during her lifetime as Queen Min, was King Gojong's wife and the most powerful political figure in late Joseon Dynasty Korea. Rising from relative obscurity, she wielded enormous influence through political acumen and factional networking. She initially cooperated with Japan but increasingly resisted Japanese imperial ambitions, seeking Russian and other foreign support to preserve Korean independence. Her fierce opposition to Japanese control made her the primary obstacle to Japanese dominance in Korea.
Q2. What was the Eulmi Incident and how did it happen?
The Eulmi Incident refers to the assassination of Empress Myeongseong on October 8, 1895, by Japanese agents and Korean collaborators. Japanese Minister Miura Goro coordinated the conspiracy involving Japanese military officers, soshi (political thugs), and disaffected Korean officers. Armed forces stormed Gyeongbokgung Palace at dawn, located the empress hiding among her ladies-in-waiting, murdered her with swords, and burned her body to destroy evidence. The attack violated every diplomatic norm and shocked international opinion.
Q3. Why did Japan want to assassinate the empress?
Japanese officials viewed Empress Myeongseong as the primary obstacle to Japanese control of Korea. After Japan's victory in the First Sino-Japanese War (1894-1895), they sought to establish dominance in Korea, but the empress actively resisted by seeking Russian support as a counterweight to Japanese influence. Her political power over King Gojong and ability to obstruct Japanese demands convinced hardliners like Minister Miura that eliminating her was necessary to establish a compliant Korean government.
Q4. What were the consequences of the assassination?
The assassination generated international condemnation damaging Japan's reputation, though show trials of conspirators produced convenient acquittals. Within Korea, it galvanized anti-Japanese sentiment, transforming the empress into a martyrdom symbol and fueling the righteous army guerrilla resistance movement. King Gojong's trust in Japan was destroyed, leading to his flight to Russian protection in 1896. The incident fundamentally poisoned Korean-Japanese relations and demonstrated the violence underlying Japanese imperial ambitions, contributing to patterns that would persist throughout the colonial period.
Q5. How is the Eulmi Incident remembered today?
The incident remains contentious in Korean-Japanese relations. Korean governments demand full Japanese acknowledgment and apology for what Koreans view as state-sponsored terrorism. Japan's inadequate accountability—vague regrets rather than clear apologies—feeds broader grievances about Japanese treatment of colonial history. For Koreans, the incident symbolizes resistance to foreign aggression and the importance of sovereignty. Empress Myeongseong is celebrated in Korean culture through dramas, films, and commemorations as a patriotic figure who died fighting for Korean independence.
We've covered everything about The Eulmi Incident and the Assassination of Empress Myeongseong: Japan's Brutal Crime in Korea. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to leave a comment below.
